Home » Take Action Have Your Say

Amherst Island Survey

As you may be aware, an Industrial Wind Farm is going to be built on Amherst Island in Ontario's drive to move over to so-called "Green Energy". With the survey below please let me know your thoughts on the proposed Amherst Island wind farm.

In periods of low demand, rather than shut down expensive wind power, we shut down less expensive producers. Then we’re stuck having to pay other jurisdictions like Quebec or New York to take our surplus from us. This just doesn’t make any sense.

Please rate whether you “strongly agree to strongly disagree” with the statement.
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Agree
Agree



Amherst Island
Do you like this survey?

Showing 637 comments

answered 2014-04-05 11:40:41 -0400
Q: In periods of low demand, rather than shut down expensive wind power, we shut down less expensive producers. Then we’re stuck having to pay other jurisdictions like Quebec or New York to take our surplus from us. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2014-04-05 11:40:27 -0400
Q: Recently the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) reported that wind energy in Ontario is being used to replace hydro electricity on the grid, rather than fossil fuel sources. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Neutral
answered 2014-04-05 11:39:48 -0400
Q: If an Amherst Islander wanted to convert their property to a Bed & Breakfast, they would encounter endless hurdles and red tape, such as acquiring building permits, Health Unit approvals and permits, municipal zoning, LLBO, Canada Revenue Agency, and a litany of inspections, yet the green energy project proposed for the Island is practically rubber-stamped. This is unjust, as it gives one group preferential treatment over another.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2014-04-05 11:39:21 -0400
Q: The proposed industrial wind turbine project is being built only a few miles from the new power plant being built in Bath. The new power plant is on the same site as the existing plant, which only operates at 5% capacity because we have a surplus of power. Building tax subsidized wind turbines on Amherst Island serves no benefit to tax payers, and the project should be cancelled.
A: Agree
answered 2014-03-30 10:05:07 -0400
Q: The proposed industrial wind turbine project is being built only a few miles from the new power plant being built in Bath. The new power plant is on the same site as the existing plant, which only operates at 5% capacity because we have a surplus of power. Building tax subsidized wind turbines on Amherst Island serves no benefit to tax payers, and the project should be cancelled.
A: Disagree
@AtLightsEdge tweeted link to this page. 2013-07-25 17:47:38 -0400
Let Randy Hillier, MPP know your thoughts on putting Industrial Wind Turbines on Amherst Island. http://www.randyhilliermpp.com/amherst_island_survey?recruiter_id=10923
Reply · Retweet · Favorite
posted about this on Facebook 2013-07-25 17:47:38 -0400
Let Randy Hillier, MPP know your thoughts on putting Industrial Wind Turbines on Amherst Island.
answered 2013-07-25 17:46:46 -0400
Q: In periods of low demand, rather than shut down expensive wind power, we shut down less expensive producers. Then we’re stuck having to pay other jurisdictions like Quebec or New York to take our surplus from us. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-07-25 17:45:54 -0400
Q: Recently the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) reported that wind energy in Ontario is being used to replace hydro electricity on the grid, rather than fossil fuel sources. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-07-25 17:45:13 -0400
Q: If an Amherst Islander wanted to convert their property to a Bed & Breakfast, they would encounter endless hurdles and red tape, such as acquiring building permits, Health Unit approvals and permits, municipal zoning, LLBO, Canada Revenue Agency, and a litany of inspections, yet the green energy project proposed for the Island is practically rubber-stamped. This is unjust, as it gives one group preferential treatment over another.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-07-25 17:44:51 -0400
Q: The proposed industrial wind turbine project is being built only a few miles from the new power plant being built in Bath. The new power plant is on the same site as the existing plant, which only operates at 5% capacity because we have a surplus of power. Building tax subsidized wind turbines on Amherst Island serves no benefit to tax payers, and the project should be cancelled.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 20:02:56 -0400
Q: In periods of low demand, rather than shut down expensive wind power, we shut down less expensive producers. Then we’re stuck having to pay other jurisdictions like Quebec or New York to take our surplus from us. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 20:02:37 -0400
Q: Recently the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) reported that wind energy in Ontario is being used to replace hydro electricity on the grid, rather than fossil fuel sources. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Disagree
answered 2013-04-13 20:01:53 -0400
Q: If an Amherst Islander wanted to convert their property to a Bed & Breakfast, they would encounter endless hurdles and red tape, such as acquiring building permits, Health Unit approvals and permits, municipal zoning, LLBO, Canada Revenue Agency, and a litany of inspections, yet the green energy project proposed for the Island is practically rubber-stamped. This is unjust, as it gives one group preferential treatment over another.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 20:01:24 -0400
Q: The proposed industrial wind turbine project is being built only a few miles from the new power plant being built in Bath. The new power plant is on the same site as the existing plant, which only operates at 5% capacity because we have a surplus of power. Building tax subsidized wind turbines on Amherst Island serves no benefit to tax payers, and the project should be cancelled.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 20:00:58 -0400
Q: Industrial wind turbines are heavily subsidized with tax dollars in Ontario, yet benefit only a few at the cost of the many.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 14:20:15 -0400
Q: In periods of low demand, rather than shut down expensive wind power, we shut down less expensive producers. Then we’re stuck having to pay other jurisdictions like Quebec or New York to take our surplus from us. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 14:19:57 -0400
Q: Recently the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) reported that wind energy in Ontario is being used to replace hydro electricity on the grid, rather than fossil fuel sources. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 14:19:32 -0400
Q: If an Amherst Islander wanted to convert their property to a Bed & Breakfast, they would encounter endless hurdles and red tape, such as acquiring building permits, Health Unit approvals and permits, municipal zoning, LLBO, Canada Revenue Agency, and a litany of inspections, yet the green energy project proposed for the Island is practically rubber-stamped. This is unjust, as it gives one group preferential treatment over another.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 14:19:10 -0400
Q: The proposed industrial wind turbine project is being built only a few miles from the new power plant being built in Bath. The new power plant is on the same site as the existing plant, which only operates at 5% capacity because we have a surplus of power. Building tax subsidized wind turbines on Amherst Island serves no benefit to tax payers, and the project should be cancelled.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 14:18:21 -0400
Q: Industrial wind turbines are heavily subsidized with tax dollars in Ontario, yet benefit only a few at the cost of the many.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 14:02:55 -0400
Q: Industrial wind turbines are heavily subsidized with tax dollars in Ontario, yet benefit only a few at the cost of the many.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 13:46:18 -0400
Q: In periods of low demand, rather than shut down expensive wind power, we shut down less expensive producers. Then we’re stuck having to pay other jurisdictions like Quebec or New York to take our surplus from us. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 13:46:08 -0400
Q: Recently the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) reported that wind energy in Ontario is being used to replace hydro electricity on the grid, rather than fossil fuel sources. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 13:45:56 -0400
Q: If an Amherst Islander wanted to convert their property to a Bed & Breakfast, they would encounter endless hurdles and red tape, such as acquiring building permits, Health Unit approvals and permits, municipal zoning, LLBO, Canada Revenue Agency, and a litany of inspections, yet the green energy project proposed for the Island is practically rubber-stamped. This is unjust, as it gives one group preferential treatment over another.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 13:45:36 -0400
Q: The proposed industrial wind turbine project is being built only a few miles from the new power plant being built in Bath. The new power plant is on the same site as the existing plant, which only operates at 5% capacity because we have a surplus of power. Building tax subsidized wind turbines on Amherst Island serves no benefit to tax payers, and the project should be cancelled.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 13:45:11 -0400
Q: In periods of low demand, rather than shut down expensive wind power, we shut down less expensive producers. Then we’re stuck having to pay other jurisdictions like Quebec or New York to take our surplus from us. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Strongly Agree
answered 2013-04-13 13:44:54 -0400
Q: Recently the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) reported that wind energy in Ontario is being used to replace hydro electricity on the grid, rather than fossil fuel sources. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Disagree
answered 2013-04-13 13:44:53 -0400
Q: Recently the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) reported that wind energy in Ontario is being used to replace hydro electricity on the grid, rather than fossil fuel sources. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Disagree
answered 2013-04-13 13:44:52 -0400
Q: Recently the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) reported that wind energy in Ontario is being used to replace hydro electricity on the grid, rather than fossil fuel sources. This just doesn’t make any sense.
A: Disagree
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  …  21  22  Next →
Sign a Petition
Upcoming Events
Hydro Facts

Sign In or Sign Up

You can sign up or sign in using

Ontario's Debt Clock

Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.